For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

29 - English Language and Literature

Bangor University

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 0 of 0 in the submission
Brief description

Malory completed his Morte Darthur in 1469-70. The two earliest surviving witnesses, the Winchester manuscript and Caxton's printed edition, were both produced within the next sixteen years. The manuscript was soon lost, but its rediscovery in 1934 revealed that these two texts had striking differences. Eighty years of scholarship in a variety of disciplines has discovered a good deal about who changed what and why: the Caxton, for instance, tends to be very unreliable in the last few lines of particular kinds of pages. These discoveries should make it possible to produce an edition of Malory's book that comes closer than ever before to what Malory intended to write. The present edition aims to do that, basing itself on the Winchester manuscript, but treating it merely as the most important piece of evidence for what Malory intended, and the default text where no other reading can be shown to be more probable.

Type
R - Scholarly edition
DOI
-
Publisher of book
Boydell & Brewer
Title of edition
Sir Thomas Malory. Le Morte Darthur
ISBN of book
978 1 84384 314 6
Year of publication
2013
URL
-
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information

The two primary texts of Malory’s Morte Darthur are Caxton’s edition and a manuscript discovered in 1934. Neither shows much respect for Malory’s wording, but it can often be recovered by comparing them. Unfortunately, the standard academic edition is a byword for “best-text” conservatism. This edition aims to attend to both texts equally in the light of new discoveries, which have for instance identified many passages in Caxton’s edition as his invention and shown that the scribes of the manuscript were unexpectedly creative. The result is over 2000 new readings and a better understanding how early texts came into being.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-