For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

35 - Music, Drama, Dance and Performing Arts

University of York : A - Music

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 42 of 52 in the submission
Chapter title

Sounds, gamuts, action : Cage’s pluralist universe

Type
C - Chapter in book
DOI
-
Publisher of book
Orpheus Institute
Book title
MetaCage : Essays on and around Freeman Etudes / Fontana Mix / Aria
ISBN of book
9789490389017
Year of publication
2009
URL
-
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information

This is the second in a series of four articles that attempt to establish a cultural framework for Cage’s philosophy and practice. The first, “Pragmatics of Silence,” was published as chapter in _Silence, Music, Silent Music_ (Ashgate, 2007); the third, “In re: Experimental Music,” appeared in _Contemporary Music Review _31:1 (2012); the fourth, “In re: Experimental Analysis,” is scheduled for publication in _Contemporary Music Review_ in 2014. I choose to submit this item in part because it is also published within a volume which I edited and for which I wrote a Preface.

“Sounds, gamuts, actions” takes up one of the threads from the first article, continuing the argument that Cage’s true philosophical roots are to be found not in the Orient but in American pragmatism. It also scrutinizes the seemingly innocent word “sound,” so pervasive in Cage’s writing. The discussion of Cage’s antecedents is continued in the third of the articles; the analysis of “sounds” and their representation is continued in the fourth.

The whole has been informed not only by scholarly work and analysis but by practice-based research, notably in designing and implementing England’s largest contribution to the Cage centennial, the international festival-conference Getting Nowhere. That event, lasting four days and integrating dozens of performances with commentary, paper sessions, and writing, integrated and informed the research presented in the four papers of which “Sounds, gamuts, actions” is but one part.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-