For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

34 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory

Newcastle University

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 11 of 53 in the submission
Chapter title

Design and Perspective Construction: why is the Chalice the shape it is?

Type
C - Chapter in book
DOI
-
Publisher of book
Cartei e Bianchi Edizioni
Book title
L'arte della matematica nella prospettiva
ISBN of book
9788895686158
Year of publication
2009
URL
-
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information

Peer-reviewed research presented at the inaugural conference of the International Centre for the Study of Perspective in Urbino and subsequently included in an edited book. Other conference contributors included Kim Veltman, Judith Field, Rocco Sinisgalli, Jean Dhombres. This research involved the detailed examination of the ‘Chalice’, the iconic (early?) renaissance drawing normally attributed to Uccello. The key question was how, and to what extent, have the drawing methods and systems, (or other technologies and tools), impacted on the imagery and/or a design? Kern in 1915 examined aspects of the perspective construction, but the practicalities of the making of this seemingly complex drawing have not, to date, been examined in any depth. By using photographic enlargements and examining the drawing itself, particularly the inscribed traces on the surface of the paper, the likely procedures and the order in which they were carried out were established. Inferences about those aspects of its making that are now lost; most likely a supplementary drawing, attached physically to the original, are made. This process was informed by my expertise in perspective construction methods developed through my drawing practice. The findings uniquely inform four key areas: firstly, the technicalities of its geometric/perspective construction; secondly, how the overall design of the depicted object is the result of the methods used in the construction. The paper extends research first presented in 2006 in the Nexus Journal of Architecture and Mathematics and returned in RAE2008. This revisited paper additionally comments on the drawing’s attribution, (unlikely to be Uccello), its evident relationship to another Uffizi drawing, and relates it to the same geometric and proportional concerns evident in Leonardo’s centralised church designs; and fourthly, it places it as a precursor to a whole class of later perspectival drawings of configurations of geometric solids, such as those by Jean-Francois Niceron.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-