For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

34 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory

Royal College of Art

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 0 of 0 in the submission
Output title

Design for social and environmental enterprise

Type
E - Conference contribution
DOI
-
Name of conference/published proceedings
Undisciplined!: Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference
Volume number
-
Issue number
-
First page of article
332
ISSN of proceedings
-
Year of publication
2008
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information

In this paper, Brass set out a research agenda, proposing a shift in the role of design from commercial and manufacturing issues to social and environmental ones. The paper triangulates the work of current academic design thinking on the reduction of products’ environmental impact through composition (McDonough and Braungart) or life extension (Jonathan Chapman) with thinking outside the field of design offered by experts in systems (Donella Meadows, Peter Senge), economic futures (Andrew Zolli, Amartya Sen) and community engagement (Ezio Manzini), and builds a link to current and future policy goals (Sustainable Development Commission, Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, etc.).

Outlining design’s predominant use as a tool for boosting economic growth, the paper highlights both the value and relevance of design tools for addressing social and environmental issues. Service design thinking allows people’s needs to be fulfilled through new, easier and more desirable experiences, without a dependency on sales of physical objects. Citing various initiatives (RED, DOTT ’07, Zest Innovation, etc.) the paper supports the notion of transferability of design skills to public service challenges, and highlights the potential for design to play an active role in the creation and support of social and environmental enterprises.

Brass suggests that sustainability is an overwhelmingly social issue, and that design needs to play to its user-centric strengths. To facilitate this, design education would need to be broadened to stretch beyond the current focus on products and to include a more systemic approach. Three main gaps in current design education are identified: infrastructure, interconnectivity, and relationships between business, government and people.

From this perspective, a proposition has been developed offering a practical application of the thinking presented. HiRise Gardens (SEED Foundation), proposing a new design-led approach to waste management, was later developed into FoodLoop (see Brass REF Output 3).

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-