For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

34 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory

University of Lincoln

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 35 of 47 in the submission
Chapter title

The common field landscape: cultural commemoration and the impact of enclosure, c.1770-1850

Type
C - Chapter in book
DOI
-
Publisher of book
Palgrave Macmillan
Book title
The Land Question in Britain 1750-1950
ISBN of book
9780230203402
Year of publication
2010
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information

Context:

The research in this chapter extends prior work presented by Waites at the conference Land Questions: Social, Cultural and Political Perspectives on the Land in the United Kingdom 1750-2000 (University of Hertfordshire, July 2005). It forms part of an edited collection of papers which offer the first pan-British analysis of ‘the land question’, of the social, cultural and political debates surrounding the use and ownership of land.

Research resides within the processes of:

the novel assessment of how English landscape painters depicted unenclosed commons and wastes as a vehicle for expressing Romantic feelings of space, freedom and sublimity; providing a new social, cultural, political and economic perspective on the land question as it played out in England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland; proposing a new way of understanding the development of the English landscape painting tradition.

Insights:

This chapter offers the first published account of how English landscape painters of the early-nineteenth century demonstrated a nostalgic awareness of the social impact of changing agricultural methods by finding beauty in the uninterrupted, pre-enclosure flatness of common arable or ‘waste’ land.

A review of the volume stated that although the book was ‘very strong in its chronicle of attempts to theorize and politically shape land reform, it is not as strong in detailing the role that the land played in the expressive culture of the 19th and 20th centuries. The one exception is Ian Waites’s study of the cultural commemoration of enclosure.’ Professor Jamie Bronstein, New Mexico State University, http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/946

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-