For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

34 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory

University of Southampton

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 0 of 0 in the submission
Article title

'Yes... but when?' - an open letter

Type
D - Journal article
Title of journal
Parallax
Article number
-
Volume number
16
Issue number
3
First page of article
62
ISSN of journal
1353-4645
Year of publication
2010
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information

Research content/process:

The output was invited for submission to a special issue of Parallax journal to ‘reflect the different ways in which affirmation can itself be affirmed’ (Gary Peters, issue editor). The output experiments with different writing and layout conventions, testing the relationship between these and notions of truth and certainty. At the heart of output is a reading of a scene from Cixous’ Love Itself (2008), which brings a site of affirmation (between lovers) up against discourse of critical philosophy (frequently framed in terms of negation). The output explores the possibility that to say ‘yes’ is never just yours to say alone. Whereas ‘no’ can be all your own. A ‘yes’ is never just a ‘yes’, but a when, where, how, with/for whom. ‘Yes, I do/will…’ extends out to another. In the interstice there is always a matter of ‘vertical time’, when (one hopes) it is tested and affirmed. In order to examine the plurality of affirmation, the paper draws influence from Cixous’ methods of writing, in this case to construct a dialogue form, and includes ‘novelistic’ fragments with critical sources, which bring into view the precariousness of saying ‘yes’, but which also questions the relationship between (the time of) writing and living. ‘Yes’ potentially reveals a wholly other form of philosophy, arguably a form of writing – the ‘most beautiful of all failures’ (Cixous) – that cannot be finally asserted, at least not by one alone.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-