For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

16 - Architecture, Built Environment and Planning

London Metropolitan University

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 20 of 45 in the submission
Title or brief description

Interim Uses – London Legacy Development Corporation

Type
N - Research report for external body
DOI
-
Commissioning body
London Thames Gateway Development Corporation
Year
2013
URL
-
Number of additional authors
-
Additional information

This report is a presentation of best practice in developing and delivering interim use projects, to enable the London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) to devise their own interim use policy, programme and internal working methods to deliver successful projects.

The research was completed by Lara Kinneir. Assistant researcher was Lee Wiltshire. It presents 50 case studies and an evaluation of requirements to plan, design and deliver projects in the ‘Precedent Atlas’, and a ‘Methods Manual’ of best practice. We compiled twenty case studies, and 30 were compiled by other consultancy teams using our criteria. We edited and evaluated all case studies, and collated research into seven books.

The template enables key pieces of research and evidence to be presented, from desk top research, direct contact with clients, consultants, and users of projects. These documents set out new empirical material and analysis of practice that currently does not exist (build costs, staffing requirements, space requirements, publicity) to enable others to assess and deliver similar projects

This is the first evaluation of interim use project development and delivery. The research provides a substantive evidence base that is currently being applied to the LLDC’s interim use policy, financial planning for delivery of interim uses and their overall approach to delivery.

The LLDC is currently using the research in the following ways:

1. Public and political debate being shaped and informed; including the challenging of established norms, modes of thought and practices.

2. Research findings being used by professional bodies to define best practice, formulate policy, and lobby local government and other relevant stakeholders.

3. Practitioner debate being informed and stimulated by research findings.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
3 - Cass Cities
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-