For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

16 - Architecture, Built Environment and Planning

Sheffield Hallam University

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 33 of 79 in the submission
Article title

Linking interventions to outcomes in area regeneration: The New Deal for Communities Programme in England

Type
D - Journal article
Title of journal
Town Planning Review
Article number
-
Volume number
81
Issue number
2
First page of article
151
ISSN of journal
0041-0020
Year of publication
2010
Number of additional authors
3
Additional information

This paper draws on evidence emerging from the 2001-2010 national evaluation of the New Deal for Communities (NDC) programme funded by Communities and Local Government and its predecessor departments. The NDC programme was a ten year regeneration scheme designed to improve outcomes for residents in some 39 deprived English neighbourhoods, each accommodating on average 10,000 people. The programme was intended to achieve positive outcome change across six outcomes: three relating to the area: crime, community and housing and the environment; and three to local residents: education, health and worklessness. The evaluation involved a range of data collation and analysis tasks including four household surveys in all 39 NDC areas and similarly deprived comparator areas every two years, collection of administrative data through time on indicators such as benefit claimants and educational attainment statistics; and also qualitative work in NDC case study areas. Change was assessed both in relation to the 39 NDC areas and also for those living within these localities. Final evaluation reports were published in 2010.

Academic papers drawing on evidence from the evaluation fall into four categories: (i) assessments of methodologies used to identify change (ii) change for areas (iii) change for residents (iv) change for one of the programme's six outcomes.

This is one of two papers to fall into category (iii). Using longitudinal data this paper considers the degree to which those benefiting from an NDC-funded project saw associated positive outcome change. Wilson (4) identifies outcomes for those staying in NDC areas between 2002 and 2008.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-