For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

16 - Architecture, Built Environment and Planning

Sheffield Hallam University

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 36 of 79 in the submission
Article title

Measuring the impact of community engagement on policy making in the UK: a local case study

Type
D - Journal article
Title of journal
Journal of Civil Society
Article number
-
Volume number
5
Issue number
2
First page of article
169
ISSN of journal
1744-8689
Year of publication
2009
Number of additional authors
1
Additional information

This paper draws on evidence emerging from the 2001-2010 national evaluation of the New Deal for Communities (NDC) programme funded by Communities and Local Government and its predecessor departments. The NDC programme was a ten year regeneration scheme designed to improve outcomes for residents in some 39 deprived English neighbourhoods, each accommodating on average 10,000 people. The programme was intended to achieve positive outcome change across six outcomes: three relating to the area: crime, community and housing and the environment; and three to local residents: education, health and worklessness. The evaluation involved a range of data collation and analysis tasks including four household surveys in all 39 NDC areas and similarly deprived comparator areas every two years, collection of administrative data through time on indicators such as benefit claimants and educational attainment statistics; and also qualitative work in NDC case study areas. Change was assessed both in relation to the 39 NDC areas and also for those living within these localities. Final evaluation reports were published in 2010.

Academic papers drawing on evidence from the evaluation fall into four categories: (i) assessments of methodologies used to identify change (ii) change for areas (iii) change for residents (iv) change for one of the programme's six outcomes.

This paper is one of five to fall into category (iv): it explores community engagement within one locality. Cole (1) considers residential satisfaction in housing markets. Batty (2) examines change in education outcomes. Lawless (3) considers change with regard to community outcomes across the Programme as a whole, and Crisp (2) explores the evolution of worklessness policy within the programme.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-