For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

34 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory

University of Wolverhampton

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 5 of 114 in the submission
Output title

‘No Time’: Contemporaneity between Time Pressure and Procrastination

Type
E - Conference contribution
DOI
-
Name of conference/published proceedings
More Light. Catalogue of the 5th Moscow Biennale. The public program of Moscow biennale ISSN/ISBN: 978 94 9177 5307
Volume number
-
Issue number
-
First page of article
313
ISSN of proceedings
-
Year of publication
2013
URL
-
Number of additional authors
-
Additional information

Brief Description

The essay represents Penzin’s current research into the relationship between art and ‘contemporary temporality’ and its social-political context, and contributes to the current debate about the notion of contemporaneity. The essay is partly based on different versions of a conference paper, which was delivered at an international summer school at Baltic Art Center (Sweden, 2011), at the Summer School of the Institute of Contemporary Art in Moscow (2011 and 2013, with students of the Royal College of Art and Goldsmiths), as well as a presentations at the art-centre Matadero in Madrid (2011) and the ‘Slow Time’ round table at the 5th Moscow Biennale of Contemporary Art (2013).

Research Rationale

The essay raises the problem of a ‘contemporary temporality’ in its relation to cultural production. Two quite obvious and contrasted poles distinguish this temporality: ‘time pressure’ (no time to do anything) and ‘procrastination’ (plenty of time spent without doing anything valuable). The research asks about the driving social-political forces, which produce this form of temporality. It also explores consequences of this twofold temporality for contemporary art practice, suggesting the idea of ‘no-time-based-art’.

Strategies Undertaken

The research strategy consists of combining a political-theological genealogy of contemporary constellations and concepts (for example, practiced by Giorgio Agamben) and the recent discussions on late capitalism and temporality. The essay suggests that the ancient theological formula which links time with Creation (if there is no time, there is no creation) can be read in the present day as well, including in relation to its anthropological and aesthetic dimensions, but outside its direct theological sense. The essay argues this position through a critical analysis of Moishe Postone, Fredric Jameson, Antonio Negri, Franco Berardi, Maurizio Lazzarato and Boris Groys. The contemporary ‘society without time’ (Lazzarato) also affects art production, creating strange effects of ‘no-time-based-art’.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
A - Art, Critique and Social Practice
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-