Output details
15 - General Engineering
University of Warwick
Comparison of cochlear delay estimates using otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses
This study has informed new biophysical modelling of cochlear mechanics (Liu and Neely, 2010 dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3337233; Sisto 2011 dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3569700; Young, 2012 dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4707447; Resetshwane and Neely, 2012 dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-012-0336-1) and auditory evoked potentials (Rønne, 2012 dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3699171; Verhulst, 2013 dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4800566); new audiometric clinical stimuli (Bennett and Özdamar, 2010 dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3467769; and the perception of frequency-dependent cochlear delay (Wojtczak, 2012 dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3665995, 2013a dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4773350, 2013b dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-013-0387-y; Bianchi, 2013
dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-013-0406-z). Sisto (2011) dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3569700 uses this papers evidence for a ‘backwards travelling-wave’ mode of propagation within the cochlea, further experiments and modelling to discount the alternative ‘fast-wave’ mode - an on-going debate in the auditory mechanics community.
