You are in : Home » Results & submissions » Select UOA » 11 - Computer Science and Informatics » View submission: University College London » Outputs » Detail

Output details

11 - Computer Science and Informatics

University College London

Return to search Previous output Next output

Output 0 of 0 in the submission

Output title

Generating and evaluating choices for fixing inconsistencies in UML design models

Type

E - Conference contribution

DOI

10.1109/ASE.2008.20

Name of conference/published proceedings

ASE 2008 - 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Proceedings

Volume number

Issue number

First page of article

ISSN of proceedings

Year of publication

2008

URL

Number of additional authors

Additional information

<07>Success of model-driven engineering will depend on availability of powerful tools for elaborating and managing large-scale models (similar to code IDE). This paper shows, for the first time, how modelling tools can generate concrete propositions for fixing inconsistencies in UML models taking into account inter-dependencies between consistency rules (a harder problem than generating code fixes). Validation of correctness and scalability on more than 30 industrial UML models of up to 12,000 elements. Technique, developed in paper as extension to IBM Rational Rose, has since been ported to Matlab/Stateflow, IBM Rational Software Modeler, and the Dopler suite for product line engineering.

Interdisciplinary

Cross-referral requested

Research group

None

Citation count

Proposed double-weighted

Double-weighted statement

Reserve for a double-weighted output

Non-English

English abstract