For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

34 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory

University of Derby

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 24 of 37 in the submission
Article title

'Sculpture in the Home:selling modernism to Post-war British Homemakers'

Type
D - Journal article
DOI
-
Title of journal
The Sculpture Journal Also online ISSN: 1756-9923
Article number
-
Volume number
17
Issue number
2
First page of article
37
ISSN of journal
1366-2724
Year of publication
2008
Number of additional authors
-
Additional information

Based on research into the 'Sculpture in the Home' exhibitions of the 1940s and 1950s, the essay complements and extends issues addressed in the author’s HMI book (Output 1); it was commissioned by Christopher Bedford, Assistant Curator Contemporary Art, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, for a special issue of The Sculpture Journal devoted to British Modernism.

Drawing on the literature of design history, the essay shows how the 'Sculpture in the Home' exhibitions, jointly organised by the Arts Council and the Council of Industrial Design, contributed to governmental efforts to modernize domestic design in post-war Britain, encouraged by a circle of influential artists, designers and critics, such as Gordon Russell, Henry Moore and Herbert Read. The essay argues that despite evidence of public and critical interest in domestic sculpture, the attempt to popularise the consumption of modern sculpture among post-war homemakers failed, like the design reform campaign, due to public alienation from modernist aesthetics and the high costs.

It argues for a re-assessment of the relationship between Modernism and domesticity, which art historians, such as Christopher Reed, have proposed were typically antagonistic. It suggests instead that the display of sculpture in the post-war home was compatible with the traditions of the English interwar avant-garde, with its roots in the Arts and Crafts Movement (at least until this aesthetic was superseded around 1960 by gallery-oriented modes of formalist criticism).

Like Output 1, the high standard of scholarship is based on research at the National Art Library, Tate Gallery Archive and Design Council Archive, supplemented by extensive study of the primary and secondary literature of British sculpture, governmental patronage of art and design, the art market and British Modernism. The sources are identified and acknowledged in footnotes. The essay underwent a thorough process of peer-review and editorial discussion and revision.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-