For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

34 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory

Sheffield Hallam University

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 38 of 93 in the submission
Article title

Hold, grasp, clutch or grab: Consumer grip choices during food container opening

Type
D - Journal article
Title of journal
Applied Ergonomics
Article number
-
Volume number
42
Issue number
5
First page of article
627
ISSN of journal
00036870
Year of publication
2011
Number of additional authors
1
Additional information

'This paper explores the effect of grip choice on the ability to access container packaging. Using bespoke equipment previously described in other studies (Yoxall, A. et.al. (2010) 'Understanding the use of tools for opening packaging', Universal Access in the Information Society, 9 (3), 273-281; and Yoxall, A. et.al. (2010) 'How wide do you want the jar? The effect of diameter on opening of wide-mouth closure'. Packaging Technology and Science, 23 (1), 11-18.), this research ascertained users' preferred grips when accessing container packaging. These were then measured against known 'standard' grips, categorised by Dr Yoxall in his previous works: Yoxall, A. et. al. (2008) 'Size does matter: further studies in hand-pack interaction using computer simulation', Packaging Technology and Science, 21 (2), 61-72; and Yoxall, A. et. al. (2007) 'Getting to grips with packaging: using ethnography and computer simulation to understand hand–pack interaction', Packaging Technology and Science, 20 (3) 217-229). Users' hand size was also measured.

The results showed that men used a wider range of grip types than women (they also produce consistently higher torque, as expected) and that women tended to use one grip type that was also their strongest. Hand size was seen to be a major influence on the choice of grip adopted. This work showed the significance of hand and product size interaction affecting ability to use the product and hence limiting options for women.

Interdisciplinary
Yes
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-