For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

34 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory

University of Reading : B - Typography & Graphic communication

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 2 of 37 in the submission
Chapter title

A reconstruction of stencilling based on the description by Gilles Filleau des Billettes

Type
C - Chapter in book
DOI
-
Publisher of book
Hyphen Press
Book title
Typography Papers 9
ISBN of book
9780907259480
Year of publication
2013
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information

This chapter is linked with Kindel, E. (ed.) (2013), ‘The description of stencilling by Gilles Filleau des Billettes: transcription and translation’ in the same book. The first of these paired items recounts and illustrates the reconstruction and testing of tools, furniture, and working methods for stencilling texts. The reconstruction is based on a description of stencilling written by Gilles Filleau des Billettes. The second item presents the text of Des Billettes’s description, written as part of the ‘description of trades' (Description des arts et métiers) carried out under the direction of the Académie royale des Sciences in Paris in the 1690s. The text is given in transcription (French, 10,000 words), accompanied by a parallel English translation; both are supplemented with reproductions of the marginal and intra-textual drawings made by Des Billettes. This research provides a close study of a – and possibly the – foundational document of stencilling of this kind. The method of reconstruction at the heart of the research raises numerous questions about the nature of the equipment and the method of working, and about the conduct of stencilling more generally – questions unlikely to arise through other modes of enquiry. Stencil work made with the reconstructed equipment thereafter provides historically credible examples not only of how such stencil work looks when well executed, but also its faults when poorly executed. Examples of work, illustrated in the essay, are compared to contemporary stencil artefacts, from which it is possible to detect whether the equipment and methods Des Billettes describes were used at the time. These comparisons add considerably to the picture of early stencilling, about which little is otherwise known.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-