Output details
11 - Computer Science and Informatics
University College London
Return to search
Output 0 of 0 in the submission
Output title
Is cloned code more stable than non-cloned code?
Type
E - Conference contribution
Name of conference/published proceedings
Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Working Conference on
Volume number
-
Issue number
-
First page of article
57
ISSN of proceedings
-
Year of publication
2008
URL
-
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information
<09> The first paper that empirically studied whether duplicated code is more stable than non-duplicated code on a large scale. This paper (and the ones following it) have disproved the assumption that duplicated code will cause higher maintenance costs. The research lead to me winning the Hewlett Packard Fossology award. The results have been replicated and confirmed by at least five different leading groups and lead to even more ongoing followup research.
Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Citation count
30
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-
