For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

34 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory

Open University

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 0 of 0 in the submission
Article title

Beard Patentee: Daguerrotype Property and Authorship

Type
D - Journal article
DOI
-
Title of journal
Oxford Art Journal
Article number
-
Volume number
36
Issue number
3
First page of article
369
ISSN of journal
0142-6540
Year of publication
2013
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information

This study of early British photography (daguerreotypes), patent law and authorship is based on extensive archival research, examination of the current literature on intellectual property law, and theories of the self. It is the first output from a Leverhulme Trust funded research on intellectual property law, photography and biography. Included are ten previously unpublished early daguerreotypes. A work of cutting-edge cultural history which, through studying the case law of early photography legal depositions and affidavits, held at the National Record Office, Kew, this essay reflects on the way that authorship and careers were shaped and constrained. In addition to lectures in British universities, preliminary versions of this paper have been presented at Yale University and University of California, Berkeley and as key-note addresses at the University of Bergen and the University of Leeds.

While there has been much recent discussion of copyright, patents remain under researched as cultural phenomena. However, Edwards argues that patent law played a central role in defining modern conceptions of art and photography by joining intellectual property with image production, to create a distinctly modern sphere of authorship. The essay focuses on the prosecutions, conducted during the 1840s and 1850s, by the British patent holder for the daguerreotype - the merchant Richard Beard. Investigating Beard’s business model for his three London studios and subsidiary licensed studios, the essay asks what authorship meant in the case of a mass-image producing enterprise, which employed dozens of operators as well as numerous subsidiary photographers all trading under license to Beard. The essay brings a fresh historical perspective to debates on the nature of authorship, considering the special characteristics of collective making and the mass production of portraits.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-