For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

35 - Music, Drama, Dance and Performing Arts

University of Ulster

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 16 of 53 in the submission
Article title

Grotowski e la ricezione: Lo spettatore

Type
D - Journal article
DOI
-
Title of journal
REPERTÓRIO: Teatro & Dança
Article number
1
Volume number
16/20
Issue number
-
First page of article
102
ISSN of journal
2175-8131
Year of publication
2013
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information

This article stems from a long-term exploration of issues of reception. It uses the structures of spoken (rather than ‘academic’) language in an attempt to preserve the criteria of transmission of knowledge set out in Grotowskian tradition. Most of the material quoted is unpublished or obscure.

The present text is a republication (with illustrations, but otherwise unchanged) of the essay that first appeared in May 2013 in the online journal "Limina Teatri" (at http://www.liminateatri.it/giulianocampo.htm and http://www.liminateatri.it/giulianocampoII.htm). This new version (which appeared in October 2013) is being submitted simply because the presentation is superior.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
Yes
English abstract

Among the wider implications of the concept of reception, this study analyses in particular the research on theatrical space and the relationship with spectators that Grotowski and his ‘Teatr Laboratorium’ undertook in successive phases of their work: the re-enactment of ‘Ritual Theatre’ (1959-1969), then the radical change that came with ‘Active Culture’ and the practice of ‘Paratheatre’ (1970-1978), where spectators were replaced by participants. The article then summarises developments in the next phases of Grotowski’s work, the ‘Theatre of Sources’ (1979-1982), and ‘Art as Vehicle’ (1986-1999), where his focus moved from what he called ‘horizontal’ to ‘vertical’ reception.