For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

20 - Law

University of Manchester

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 0 of 0 in the submission
Article title

Plea Bargaining: Enigmas of Coercion, Fairness and Efficiency: Interpreting Fifty Years of Conflicted Research into Its Contemporary Consequences

Type
D - Journal article
DOI
-
Title of journal
Issues on Juvenile Crimes and Delinquency
Article number
-
Volume number
32
Issue number
6
First page of article
4
ISSN of journal
1006-1509
Year of publication
2013
URL
-
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information
-
Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
Yes
English abstract

This article was written in English and translated into Chinese for publication in the only citation-indexed criminology journal in the PRC. It examines the practice of “plea bargaining” which has dominated the U.S. conviction process since the mid-19th century and, post-1990, has exploded globally. No work since a 1979 Special Issue of Law and Society Review has evaluated the literature on the consequences of bargaining. Claims that it boosts fairness and efficiency of the court process find little research support and rest on the ‘shadow of trial’ model which has been contested by scholars of game theory and psychological decision-making.