For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

34 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory

Cardiff Metropolitan University (joint submission with University of South Wales and University of Wales Trinity Saint David)

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 12 of 42 in the submission
Article title

English Pottery by Rackham and Read: A Question of Attribution

Type
D - Journal article
Title of journal
The Journal of Modern Craft
Article number
-
Volume number
6
Issue number
3
First page of article
275
ISSN of journal
1749-6772
Year of publication
2013
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information

This article offers a new understanding of the book ‘English Pottery’ by Bernard Rackham and Herbert Read, first published in 1924. The book’s importance lies in the way that it articulated certain key aesthetic principles that resonate within the field of ceramics to the present day. Contemporary commentators continue to take an interest in the text and are particularly drawn to it as an early work by Herbert Read, who became one of the most important art critics of the 20th century. Typically, interpretations privilege the mature ideas of Herbert Read.

A publisher’s proof of English Pottery was given to Cardiff School of Art and Design as part of a series of donations from Bernard Rackham’s family between 2002 and 2008. This proof is marked in coloured pencil and these markings appear to indicate which parts of the book were written by which author. This marked text has given an unprecedented opportunity to produce an article that reassesses the relative contributions of Rackham and Read and re-evaluates key passages in terms of the two authors’ particular interests, as well as points of divergence between them. Contrary to the assumptions of all other commentators, it is shown that it is Bernard Rackham rather than Herbert Read who must be recognised as the lead author of ‘English Pottery’.

As the first piece of research that identifies and analyses the respective contributions of the two authors of ‘English Pottery’, this article not only provides new historical information but also advances understanding in terms of the re-interpretation of the aesthetic principles that have underpinned the development of ceramics during the decades since the publication of the book. The conclusion is offered that ‘English Pottery’ needs to be interpreted anew on the basis of a revised understanding of the balance of authorship.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-