For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

36 - Communication, Cultural and Media Studies, Library and Information Management

Canterbury Christ Church University

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 16 of 48 in the submission
Title and brief description

'Family Tree' and 'Matter & Memory'.

Mixed Media Artwork

Type
L - Artefact
Location
Exhiited in the Royal Academy of Arts Summer Exhibition, London, 9 June - 17 August 2010
Year of production
2010
URL
-
Number of additional authors
0
Additional information

These works engage with ‘playful optics’ - a reworking of Duchamp’s ‘playful physics’ (see Henderson, ‘Duchamp in Context’, 2005).

The title of ‘Matter and Memory’ is taken from Henri Bergson’s 1896 book of the same name. Drawing on Bergson, the work examines how an object can be presented simultaneously both as a simulation and a physical thing. The view through the glass orb, (which references the mechanism of the human eye) can be viewed as a simulation of subjective perception. The virtuality of this experience is contrasted by the materiality of the sculpture. The work consists of a surgical endoscope (a surgical instrument used to see inside the body used in keyhole surgery) penetrating through an inverted tree trunk. Through the endoscope, viewers see an image of the space around the sculpture, which they perceive to be inverted and refracted in comparison with their experiential memory of that space.

‘Family Tree’ consists of a white box the same scale as the human head. The viewer is required to bend down to look through an eye-shaped aperture cut through the front of the box, to be confronted by their own eye captured and reflected hundreds of times in the multiplying perspectives facilitated by the eccentric properties of the mirrors lining the box. The subject’s perceptions are disturbed by the apparently impossible scale of the box’s interior. The distortion works to generate a sense of subjective ambivalence through the fragmentation of the subject’s reflection. In addition the spatial scale generated inside the box by the multiplying reflections appear incompatible with the physical scale of the box. This ambiguity disturbs normal perceptions of objective reality.

By unsettling the subject’s experience of reality in this way, these works investigate the relationships between optical perception, materiality, and the mental conceptualisation of objects.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
34 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-