For the current REF see the REF 2021 website REF 2021 logo

Output details

7 - Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences

University College London (joint submission with Birkbeck College)

Return to search Previous output Next output
Output 0 of 0 in the submission
Article title

Testing the effect of the rock record on diversity: a multidisciplinary approach to elucidating the generic richness of sauropodomorph dinosaurs through time.

Type
D - Journal article
Title of journal
Biological Reviews
Article number
-
Volume number
86
Issue number
1
First page of article
157
ISSN of journal
1464-7931
Year of publication
2010
URL
-
Number of additional authors
3
Additional information

This paper presents the most up-to-date data set on the stratigraphic and geographic distributions of sauropodomorph dinosaurs (a major group of herbivorous organisms during the Mesozoic Era). These data were used to generate detailed diversity curves for this group, based on several different methods for taking into account uneven sampling of the fossil record. This paper is thus significant because of its implications for sauropodomorph evolutionary history. It also provides support for a major decrease in diversity at the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary - a phenomenon that had been noted previously, but which was normally attributed to poor sampling in the Early Cretaceous. Finally, this study provided the first comparisons of diversity curves based on different methods such as subsampling and rock modelling. As a result, this work has relevance to a much wider audience than just dinosaur palaeontologists and has thus been cited in recent discussions of geological and anthropogenic sampling biases in the fossil record. This work reports the results from Mannion's PhD project which was proposed and supervised by Upchurch. Upchurch's contribution to this paper is approximately 35% including data collection, analysis, interpretation of results and writing /editing of text.

Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Citation count
45
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-