You are in : Home » Results & submissions » Select UOA » 11 - Computer Science and Informatics » View submission: Keele University » Outputs » Detail

Output details

11 - Computer Science and Informatics

Keele University

Return to search Previous output Next output

Output 11 of 24 in the submission

Article title

How Reliable Are Systematic Reviews in Empirical Software Engineering?

Type

D - Journal article

DOI

10.1109/TSE.2010.28

Title of journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

Article number

Volume number

Issue number

First page of article

676

ISSN of journal

0098-5589

Year of publication

2010

URL

http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000282135000006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=65c2c6c1224a08d1a3198315ff59119e

Number of additional authors

Additional information

<33> This was the first paper to confirm the repeatability of systematic literature reviews in Software Engineering. The paper found that two independent systematic reviews addressing a specific specialized question performed by two experienced teams (both in the topic and research methodology) had very similar results. Of 10 papers they agreed on 9 and overall came to the same conclusions with respect to the research questions. This work strengthens the case for the adoption of systematic reviews in software engineering.

Interdisciplinary

Cross-referral requested

Research group

A - Software Engineering

Citation count

Proposed double-weighted

Double-weighted statement

Reserve for a double-weighted output

Non-English

English abstract