Output details
25 - Education
University of Oxford
Return to search
Output 0 of 0 in the submission
Article title
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias and generalization
Type
D - Journal article
Title of journal
American Psychologist
Article number
-
Volume number
63
Issue number
3
First page of article
160
ISSN of journal
0027-3171
Year of publication
2008
URL
-
Number of additional authors
2
Additional information
Peer review is widely used to evaluate most academic outcomes. This summarises my research on psychology�s most widely read journal; my multilevel statistical approach that is becoming the standard in this area; substantive demonstration of serious problems but also reforms that improved peer review. Shortlisted for APA George A. Miller Award for best contribution to general Psychology. Basis of: commentary in Nature (2009); invited keynotes: International Meeting of the Science and Technology (2010), international conference �Evolutions in peer review� (2013); Master Class, Dutch National Research Council (2009)
Interdisciplinary
-
Cross-referral requested
-
Research group
None
Proposed double-weighted
No
Double-weighted statement
-
Reserve for a double-weighted output
No
Non-English
No
English abstract
-
